And the oddity from Friday becomes even more with a fix that comes by. Given I’ve been dealing with, RegExp, “expected”, I said till evening. But an independent test script shows things are coming up from elsewhere. If you last evening’s post, the matchers returned a false negative every alternate run. Pulled the flow out to a script out of the environment only to find it is consistent. Add to that the fact that the run returns a consistent response when gets loaded with each request. ...

To pick newer stuff that you’ve wanted to play with but were not able to, is quite a wonderful feel. Put mild, that was Day 2 in all. I’ve wanted to get my feet wet with the ELK stack for some time now. 2.5 years, to be precise, from when I wanted to nail down certain bottlenecks with Tenreads’ components. At long last, things came about to fruition as I sat down today to get going with init tasks. At par with getting accustomed, lies identifying lapses (or trade-offs for political correctness). And nothing like adding a good profiling layer, to arrive at the latter. ...

A couple of weeks back, I stumbled upon an interesting piece over at Twitter. The crux being not committing lockfiles into the code base; rather odd at the outset. The rationale does make sense from a different perspective into things. When package.json files with scripts and other requirements change, so do lock files. So far, so very good the situation. Where the unseen enemy creeps up from, is with the latter’s content. ...

To put a long-winded story short, it has been quite a mix of a day, this one. From being active by 5 to welcome the first day of the new work despite lack of proper sleep, to wrapping it up talking about a good friend, hardly one that lacked action. I do have a certain something against spaghetti code and the likes, but at times, those are good places to see how things evolved. Add to that, the insights into constraints in place, as a system took baby steps, so to speak. Where things get a bit messy is when one is completely alien to and is not privy to any of the above. Quite an interesting mental exercise imo. ...

ப த ி ெ ள ன ் ் ள ன ை ா ய ட ே ் ட ( வ உ ர ர ை ை க ய ் ே ) க ர இ ு ல த ் ி ல ா த ம ெ ல ள ் ி ந இ ் ந த ் ந த ா ம ள ி ் ழ ி வ ல ர ு ை ம ் ம ல த ட ி ா ட க ் வ ட ே ம ா ந க ி ன ம ் ொ ற ழ ு ி வ ப ி ெ ட ய ் ர ட ் த த ு ் . த ு ள ் ள ே ன ் . Two rather troubling statemednts from vedAntavAvadUka villivalam nArAyaNAcAr swAmi, almost 40 years back. Both from an introductory note about his vyAkhyAna for swAmi deshikan’s paramatabha~Ngam. ...

A week back (if I remember right), I had quoted Swami Desikan and how the school has opined of Rudra/Paramashiva (at least traditional ones, laity and newer adherents can be discounted on the basis of ignorance) Was rehashing while writing a while back and something came up. Swami Desikan during the course of his commentary on IshAvAsya upaniShat, quotes harivamSha’s bhaviShyatparva and in particular Paramashiva’s statement. What’s of interest is how he refers to Rudra here "आह च सवज्ञः" (cf सर्वज्ञ्னான रुद्रன் தானே சொன்னானிறே) ...

Even cursory look at the lines of the bygone Trotsky, would provide a handful of pointers to say the least. Among others, enabling one to arrive at a justifiable, definitive, and rational understanding. An understanding in every sense of how active vanguards hijack concerns. What Trotsky raises with the Socialist Soviet, applies to the newer secular vanguards. Extending on, their other modern counterparts, in spirit and more. A succinct condensation of conditions, and of repeating history, would clear a lot of air. ...

Switches that go against the grain are in general tense, to say the least. Having stuck to a “build internal as much as possible”, I can quite agree to the nature there. Some six years back, when I first picked up Javascript at Pramati, JSPerf caught my attention. So much so the liking, I built something similar for Python. (here) I’ve wanted to build over the first cut, with learning from both JSPerf and the cProfile module, but never came by. ...

If my memory serves me right, the validity/veracity of “AnIya nIla shRRi~NgAt” / its authorship by Swami Desikan [either/both, need to rehash memory from the old discussions] was questioned a long while back. Just wish to make a note that YPP quotes it and calls an abhiyukta’s. [The AndhrapATha of the grantha is missing this episode, fwiw] Now, the context of the source set, one does also need to consider that YPP again adds a parItApI that could be considered by one to set the date in stone to circa 1372/3, in effect placing it beyond the dating of Swami Desikan. ...

The older one in all, ’ere comes along early; sickles and hammers, their need now gone. Of newer poisons, and new masks they don; world’s evolved he wonders, of humans ’ere surly. ~ Your job done they say, ’tis no longer thine day; fanciful new bottles, yet old indeed the wine. A smile crossing the rim, his glass ever so fine; a leaf on the waters, ne’er a part of the fray. ...